Pedophile politician's $150,000 bribery scheme
From the "it couldn't happen to a nicer guy" department: Mel Ignatow is dead.
Who is Mel Ignatow? He's a guy who got away with murder. Also known to many in Kentucky as a downright evil, psychopathic shitbag.
On Sept. 24, 1988, Brenda Sue Schaefer vanished. She had been planning on breaking up with her boyfriend, Mel Ignatow. Long story short (you can read the full CBS 48 Hours account of the Ignatow case by clicking a link at the bottom of this post), Schaefer's body was found on Jan. 10, 1989, and 2 years later, Mel Ignatow went on trial for her murder.
He was acquitted.
Cut to some 6 months after Ignatow's trial: a contractor was doing work in the home owned by Ignatow when Brenda Sue Schaefer disappeared. The contractor found a baggie filled with jewelry and photographs of Mel Ignatow raping and torturing Schaefer. The photos had been taken by the star witness for the State of Kentucky, the woman who basically helped ruin the State's case and get Ignatow acquitted, Mary Ann Shore. The photos depicted the exact events Shore described during her testimony at Ignatow's murder trial.
Mel Ignatow couldn't be tried again. Double jeopardy was in effect. So the State got him on perjury charges. During his perjury trial, Ignatow confessed to killing Schaefer.
He went away for a 5 to 8 year sentence, and was released from prison in 2006.
There's still no word from Louisville on how Ignatow died, but let's hope it was a painful and lonely death. If there is a hell and people burn there, Mel Ignatow is crispier than the Colonel's chicken right about now. [WAVE 3 TV Louisville, KY and CBS 48 Hours.]







I remember that case! Truly horrible what the victim went through, and no justice. If there's a place worse than Hell, I hope he goes there. Some people are just too evil for Hell.
Posted 09/01/2008 at 05:48:05 PMWhat ever happened to Mary Ann Shore? I assume she worked a plea. Sometimes, and far more often that I care to admit, the system fails. This case being on of them.
Posted 09/01/2008 at 06:19:24 PMMary Ann Shore-Inlow died in August, 2004. I'm sure most folks here in Louisville mourned her almost as much as they do Mel Ignatow.
Posted 09/01/2008 at 08:10:09 PMI'm a writer here in Louisville, and I can tell you the city nearly came unglued when Mel was found not guilty. I never believed a jury as stupid as the one responsible for the verdict existed. Here you had Mary Ann Shore describing how Ignatow had killed her, the girl was still missing, and apparently everyone "knew" Ignatow killed her except the fools who decided his fate. It was truly unbelievable.
Here are some related facts: My mother used to live in the same building as Ignatow's uncle, and she used to tell me how embarrassed he was of the entire situation, as they too believed he was guilty.
The Schaefer family had suffered the loss of a son even before Brenda disappeared. I can't remember his first name, but he was a Louisville Police detective who was killed along with his partner I believe about 10 years before Brenda was murdered.
While researching another case a few years back, I had the chance to speak with the lead detective who worked the Schaefer case, and he told me that he knew Ignatow was guilty from the moment he first spoke with him and, of course, that Brenda was already dead.
Posted 09/01/2008 at 10:48:16 PMThanks for posting this...
Posted 09/02/2008 at 12:45:29 PMinteresting that this creep tied his victim to a glass table to torture and kill her...
and now, we learn that he died when he fell through a glass table and bled to death.
Some sort of karma at work.
I'm sure that there are some retired detectives and a few others in various law enforcement that are going to be toasting the strange coincidence of a glass coffee table being the demise of such an evil man who has probably already meet up with Ms. Shore in hell. However, I hope the fires of hell were stoked up for Ignatow. What goes around somehow finds it way back. I hope it was a slow death.
Posted 09/02/2008 at 04:01:03 PMI just happened to read the book "Double Jeapardy" by Bob Hill. Brenda wasn't killed on the coffee table, she was killed in the bedroom. The coffee table was a key part in her sexual torture before she died, however it didn't break and kill her.
The book is factual and extremely frustrating b/c the bastard got away with her torture and murder. The Court System and the jurors completely failed this case. The jury just wanted to go home for the holidays. Several of them (read the book) didn't really care and were unbelievably unattached to what happened in this case.
It's a travesty of justice. That poor, poor woman - Brenda was.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mel_Ignatow
May Ignatow burn in hell forever.
Posted 11/29/2008 at 09:26:16 PMI took a criminal justice course where we studied this case. I got way too involved. I am from the Louisville area and actually ended up talking to Melvin. It was tough to track him down and get him to talk but I got him to. Then, about three weeks later, he died.
Posted 12/18/2008 at 12:24:02 PMHe kept telling me on the phone that he had "fallen and could not get up." I didnt beleive him. I guess he was telling the truth. He kept saying he was a "reborn Christian" but I dont beleive that. He called me "baby" and "sugar" on the phone. Talk about hairs standing up on your neck...creepy.
the jurors of the ignatow case prove there are to many stupid people in the world, do you know how dumb you have to be to find him not guilty, and 12 of them at that, wow!
Posted 05/13/2009 at 03:03:08 PMI hope that each of the jurors have a miserable existance. I have lived in Louisville, KY my entire life. That jury deserves to be found guilty and they all deserve to have recurring nightmares of their own painful demises. No rest for the wicked, jurors. I hope you all realize that you are just as guilty of murder as Mel Ignatow!!
Posted 06/28/2009 at 09:58:31 PMI agee with Catherine, my mom was murdered in 1992 by a friend of my son's, he confessed and is on death row in Texas, he went back to court today and the judge is going to rule on a new trial based on DNA evidence, he was convicted because he confessed and ther were witnesses putting him in the area. I am afraid he may be set free too.
Posted 06/29/2009 at 11:06:53 PMJust finished reading the book, and was appalled at 'simplistic law' which seems to have been applied by every legal officer in charge of every venue for prosecution. Everybody had avenues to investigate: Nobody did a good job. In fact, the criminals were smarter than the police force, the FBI, and about the only thing that really did "work" was the cadaver dog they should have brought in at once, years before they did: And didn't.
Posted 09/18/2009 at 09:55:37 AM"Gentlemen's Law" seems to apply, the "Good Old Boy" crap that's stymied the South since pre-Civil war days, loses one for the home team once again. Makes you want to vomit.
The police should have found that film and that jewelry... Why didn't they find it??? Justice was lost along with that evidence so it wasn't the jurys fault. But they still should have said guilty...!!!!!
Posted 12/20/2009 at 01:04:30 PMHow was this confirmed?
Posted 12/20/2009 at 01:11:06 PMI agree with Stanley Harris. Evidence is of ultimate importance in a court trial. Police investigators rely too much on deception, trickery and false assertions and they ignore the presumption of innocence.
We ought to be very thankful for the Bill of Rights and all AMERICANS should be familiar with it. Defense attorneys as well as prosecutors sometimes misrepresent facts & fiction which, although sustained by the judge, have insidiously influenced the jurors minds. They should be held accountable and remonstrated for improper conduct. Our Bill of Rights is just, humane and fair. Only humans are unjust and biased and dumb.!
Anne Brewbaker-Dallas.
Posted 02/10/2010 at 11:21:41 AM