Man blames girlfriend's threesome for murder
Twenty-three-year-old alleged Craigslist killer Phil Markoff supposedly was motivated by gambling debt. Police in Boston are saying they believe he was seeking a way to pay back what he owed from losses, perhaps at casinos like the Foxwood in Connecticut. Yet investigators also revealed today that Markoff may have done something that wasn't too typical of someone who was primarily seeking to rob others of their money. From CBS News:
A law enforcement official who spoke on the condition of anonymity said police found items belonging to both women in Markoff's apartment in Quincy, south of Boston. The source wasn't authorized to speak about evidence in the investigation. [...] ABC News said two unidentified law enforcement sources said Markoff appeared to be collecting underwear as "souvenirs" from his alleged victims.
To be clear, the only known sexual element of Markoff's alleged crimes so far was trolling for victims in the erotic services section of Craigslist. Otherwise, JuLissa Brisman's killer allegedly struck her in the head before shooting her several times. The two other robberies possibly linked to Brisman's murder did not end in violence.
I've rarely heard of robbers keeping 'souvenirs' from victims, though, short of something like a valuable piece of jewelry. And the use of the word 'souvenirs' - the quotes suggest it was not chosen by the writer of the CBS article, but came from the police source - is very clear and specific in law enforcement parlance. It almost always implies a criminal who was acting out of a sort of pathology, usually sexual.
District Attorney Daniel Conley said the following about Markoff: "This was a brutal, vicious crime - savage, and it shows Philip Markoff is a man who is willing to take advantage of women, to hurt them, to beat them, to rob them."
The last part of Conley's statement leads me to believe his view of Markoff is that the now-former BU med student was more than just a desperate guy with a gambling problem. Maybe some of the dramatic comparisons drawn in blog comments here and elsewhere between Markoff - whom police think committed just one murder - and someone like Ted Bundy, who killed dozens of women, are slightly more apt than I thought.
Then again, maybe not. Realistically: Bundy was a sexual sadist of the worst kind, and no one really knows how many he killed. He was a necrophile, on top of all that. The comparisons between him and Markoff only work on the surface - both presentable college guys going after top-shelf careers in high-end professions, both young Republicans, both the kind of guy no one could ever believe might do such a thing.
So, let's stop comparing Phil Markoff to Bundy, after all.
That said, I believe the story here will ultimately be much more complex and perhaps stranger than the public knows, at the moment. And it will have one thing in common with the long horror movie that was the life of Ted Bundy. My bet is that we'll learn that there were two very different Phil Markoffs. He kept them separate, much of the time. There was the one whom his fiancee, Megan McAllister, claimed couldn't hurt a fly, and there was the Phil Markoff whom the authorities say cold-bloodedly battered then shot JuLissa Brisman. The latter was the wolfman to the former's Lon Chaney. It's an old split in the human psyche, but it explains a lot about the huge interest in this story. We are eternally fascinated by the remorseless beast behind what some consider to be an inoffensive facade. Because it scares us, and makes us look around and ask, 'do I know someone like that?'
Do you?
NOTE, 4/23/09 - This article in the Boston Herald seems to support the idea that Markoff wasn't just some guy with an out-of-control gambling habit who may have figured erotic services workers for easy marks. Quote:
The bombshell revelation that accused Craigslist killer Philip Markoff allegedly kept a secret stash of panties in his apartment and a gun hidden in his copy of "Gray's Anatomy" had investigators yesterday zeroing in on a deeper, darker motive behind the depraved rampage.
The article went on to term some of the things found in Markoff's residence as "creepy 'mementos'."
Guys bent on getting easy cash from a vulnerable mark don't usually do that. There was very likely a "deeper, darker motive" at work here, after all.







Perhaps more of a Dr. Jekyll and Mr.Hyde?
Posted 04/22/2009 at 09:28:02 PMSteve,
Posted 04/23/2009 at 11:18:48 AMThis guy is a local -- my hairdresser's niece was a classmate of Phil Markoff, and his family still lives and works in my immediate area geographically. Our local news media is abuzz, as you might well imagine. I am following this case with great interest and will contribute what I can to your threads -- thanks for covering it!
I find this whole thing fascinating, but it didn't truly grab my attention until it was reported that he was a medical student. It also hits a little close to home because my husband is a licensed massage therapist and advertises his services occasionally using craigslist. He works very hard at his job, and I'm sure it will affect his business a tiny bit, even if we live far from Boston.
Posted 04/23/2009 at 12:43:50 PMMarkoff is on suicide watch. This story gets weirder by the day...
Posted 04/23/2009 at 02:49:26 PMI love the fact that he's trying to commit suicide. Unfortunately he'll probably never get another chance since he is under suicide watch now.
Posted 04/23/2009 at 06:13:38 PMHe may have been a gambler and perhaps had some outstanding markers but that does not mean his motive involved gambling. Most hookers use credit cards, particularly in upscale hotels.
The real mystery in all this involves why anyone capable of becoming a medical student was so inept about the manner in which he committed the crimes and clung to his momentos and the tools of his trade.
Surely he knew his emails as well as those of his victims could be easily located, surely he knew hotels have surveillance cameras.
How can anyone be so incredibly dumb?
Couldn't he have invested a little time and money in doing things in a more sensible manner? Anyone able to master organic chemistry can surely figure out anonymous email server rings. Surely he could have worn elevator shoes, a facial disguise, hair dye, avoided the cameras, reserved an extra room, etc.
Why was he so incredibly inept?
Posted 04/23/2009 at 07:24:16 PMI'm not even a mystery buff, but I'd really like to know a lot more about Markoff's family. All I've heard is that his dad (step-dad?) is a dentist and grandfather, an attorney. Does he have siblings and if so, where is he in the lineup? Was he by any chance adopted? The general impression is that this is a guy with a huge amount of anger toward women and one that has felt "over-controlled" by somebody all his life.
Posted 04/23/2009 at 08:35:39 PMIt's a good thing they caught this sicko when they did; he has all the markings of a budding serial killer.
It would definitely be very interesting to find out more about his family history. Momma's boy perhaps?
Posted 04/23/2009 at 10:24:00 PMI am really surprised to read how all of the people
Posted 04/23/2009 at 10:36:05 PMposting here are assuming Markoff is guilty. He may
be, of course, but there's a chance the police have
the wrong guy. It wouldn't be the first time...
I just try to put myself in his family's shoes and I
think that if something like this happened to my son,
I would certainly hope that he be considered not
guilty until proven otherwise. It seems many people
have already decided the guy's guilty. We might as
well skip the trial and save some taxpayers' money.
Foolsgold: Go look up the term sociopath. It will help you a lot. Motive, at this point in the process, is simply an exercise. They have so much evidence that all they need to do is prove that this guy was a sociopath and that he was doing it for the sheer enjoyment. Whatever his motive was initially was overtaken by a need to fulfill his fantasy, to play the game he had going on. Also, the "hookers" he was dealing with were on craigslist and they were not your run of the mill escort services -- credit cards were out.
Maria: I will not say that he IS guilty but there is NO denying that EVERY sign points to it being a fact. I mean, the evidence we know of alone will convict him.
Posted 04/24/2009 at 12:36:34 AMWake up Maria! How do you suppose underwear belonging to the victims was found in his apartment, along with the same caliber gun that was used in the killing??? What about all the electronic evidence- e-mails & phone calls??? If your daughter were his fiance, would you still feel the same?
Posted 04/24/2009 at 08:15:41 AMI think not!!
Maria - I too believe in innocent until proven guilty (cornerstone of our legal system) but it doesn't mean we should blind oursevles to the writing on the wall. This isn't a Casey Anthony case lacking a murder weapon or fingerprints. It's compelling enough that they found his matching gun and girls panties in his apartment -- but the REAL kicker is that they just found his fingerprints on the other weapons used at the crimes: on the duct tape and on the plastic restraints. I'm sure there's more. Pretty hard to have duplicate fingerprints belonging to someone else. Or do you also believe the fiance's story that "they've got the wrong guy"? And don't forget the clincher -- they have two victims ALIVE who can go to trial, point straight at Markoff and say "HE did this to me - he held that gun to my head". And as far as him being a smart guy....well, you can have book-smarts and no street smarts. The biggest flaw this guy has: Arrogance. Arrogance to think he's above others and he chose victims that he thought would never turn him in. He didn't cover his tracks because he didn't think he needed to -- he thought these women were soooooo beneath him (and society in general) that no one would really care if they were victimized. Gambling is an addiction which means he's likely prone to other forms of addiction like control and domination. This robbing spree likely would not have ended once his "debts were paid". He would have become addicted to the control and as we have already seen -- it escalated into something more violent. He didn't just shoot this girl out of panick because she fought back - he BASHED her head in. That's animalistic. That's pure hatred and anger and violence. He hated her for not allowing him to dominate. And they're going to use that against him if he tries to claim self-defense.
Posted 04/24/2009 at 11:34:01 AMMarkoff seemed more like someone who was stalking his victims rather than randomly robbing them. I think his upcoming marriage was the stressor that set him off, not his gambling debts or medical school.
Posted 04/25/2009 at 01:20:55 AMExpect Markoff to be charged with robbery and possibly beating another victim down in Rhode Island in the next few days.
Evidence has been secured and matched. Right now, however, the victim is reluctant to cooperate.
Posted 04/25/2009 at 01:46:16 AMThe guy is a sex offender. He kept underwear. I heard on the news tonight that they found some "biological" evidence of some kind.
Posted 04/25/2009 at 05:05:17 AMThe guy is a freak and didn't become one overnight.
You don't steal from people to support a gambling habit! He set women up, terrified them, beat them, and murdered one who dare resist!
I think his family life must have been quite twisted.
Innocent until proven guilty is a consitutional principal that exist in instructions administered to seated jurors. It in no way applies to individuals at home entertaining themselves by reading blogs, or talking to friends. For those who fall. Between, we can continue to call Markoff "suspected" slimy killer.
Posted 04/25/2009 at 09:45:55 AMI have to wonder who the controlling women in his life were. His mysogyny is apparent, with his need to restrain and then beat the women he robbed.
Also, sociopaths don't EVER think they'll get caught. First, they believe they are entitled to do as they please, the world owes them. Second, they believe the rest of the universe is far less superior and stupid to ever catch them. Has nothing to do with whether or not he had the brains to be a medical student.
Posted 04/25/2009 at 10:57:28 AMMan comes forward with evidence Markoff was cruising the gay section as well:
http://www3.whdh.com/news/articles/local/BO111537/
Posted 04/26/2009 at 11:59:28 PMSoobs: please tell me you are *not* trying to pin this down to the fault of a woman here. The controlling women in his life made him do it. Okay, well they just found out he was reaching out to gay men too. If you want to hit up the Psych 101 textbooks, one could turn around and question what perverted man was molesting him in his crib too!
Posted 04/27/2009 at 01:41:02 PMTo Anne and others wondering about Phil's family: His parents are divorced, not sure for how long. Mother (Susan) had remarried but I think is also now divorced from that man, Phil's step-father. She lives in Oneida and works in the gift shop at the local casino, Turning Stone. Father (Richard) is a dentist in Syracuse. Paternal grandfather (Jerome) is a lawyer in Maryland. Phil has an older brother (name unknown) who's a computer programmer in Great Neck, L.I. (NY). This was all gleaned from local media coverage.
Steve -- please delete any info you deem inappropriate...
Posted 04/27/2009 at 04:47:54 PMOlder (married) brother is named Jonathan. He, his wife, and Phil's parents all visited Phil in jail this past weekend. Unconfirmed reports said Phil told his family to "forget about him", that "a lot more will be coming out."
Posted 04/27/2009 at 05:13:55 PMLaura, relax. I am NOT blaming anyone but Markoff, for his behavior. I wouldn't even say that any "controlling woman" in his life, is in fact, "controlling." Only that he may view them as such.
His own warped personality is exactly that....HIS.
Posted 04/27/2009 at 08:35:42 PMMaria:
Can you please offer up a counter then?
What I know is this:
IP Address
Ballistically Matched Gun
Victims Panties
Victims Identifications
Surveillance Photos
Finger Prints
Emails
Matching Zip Ties
Oh, and the crimes have stopped since he has been in custody.
I understand the political stance an belief that a person is innocent until proven guilty and that they need to be convicted "BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT."
Can you let me know what your reasonable doubt is?
Posted 04/27/2009 at 10:35:36 PMKudos to Megan. I was a bit harsh on her at first for jumping the gun attesting to his innocence to the media, but I'm not sure how I'd respond in the same situation only months away from nuptials. After learning today she's called off the wedding and moving on, I say power to you girl. Even if he is presumably innocent, she likely realized that a man who could keep a concealed weapon and women's underwear in their house without her knowing, obviously is a man of secrets - -and likely not the man for her. Even if he had not been convicted of any crimes, if I found those items belonging to my fiance I too would say - wtf?? Who *is* this person?? And should I be marrying him? What other secrets does he have. I truly feel sorry for her. I personally think she should write a book or sell her story after the dust clears to help her put it all behind her. Cliche and Hollywod, I know, but I think voicing her story and clearing her poor public image would help.
Posted 04/30/2009 at 12:24:46 PMTHis is a tragedy in so many ways. Of course the death of a lovely young woman is of the utmost importance I can't help but feel empathy towards Philip's family. What a wste of a brilliant mind. I highly doubt he was too interested in marriage, perhaps he was very stressed. We will more than likely never know exactly what his mental state was. Megan had to know sometohing was not quite right, no way around it.
Posted 04/30/2009 at 07:31:13 PMWHY IS IT MOTHER'S OF PRECIOUS SON'S THINK MEN CAN DO NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WRONG AS ONE SAID, IF IT WERE YER DAUGHTER WOULD YOU BE SOOOOOOOO FAST TO STAND UP FOR A F---------- MALE
Posted 05/03/2009 at 05:00:40 AM