99-year-old man beaten over parking spot
![]() |
| From Zinkhan's UGA profile page |
UPDATE
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports that Zinkhan's body has been found. As I suspected, he committed suicide and may have done so shortly after ditching his SUV.
ORIGINAL POST
A source with firsthand knowledge of George Zinkhan's troubled transition from the University of Houston to the University of Georgia filled in some information gaps about the fugitive professor's past indiscretions. The story is one of entitlement and ass-covering at the upper levels of major university administrations. It may be a serious indictment of the way some institutions of higher learning deal with troubled professors.
Professional concerns dictated that my source remain anonymous.
George M. Zinkhan III allegedly confronted his estranged wife, attorney Marie E. Bruce, outside a community theater in Athens on April 25. Witnesses say he opened fire on Bruce and two others, Tom Tanner and Ben Teague, killing all three.
Zinkhan left the scene and took his children to a neighbor. Then he vanished. Police have recovered his red SUV, passport and several other personal effects. Otherwise there has been no sign of the 6'3" professor since the 25th.
Many interviews in Athens and Atlanta publications betrayed surprise and dismay on the part of those who thought they knew Zinkhan, giving the impression that he was a friendly but withdrawn, perhaps scattered person who just snapped, perhaps under the strain of a marriage going sour.
I was contacted by others who felt there was more to the story, and I covered those allegations here: "George Zinkhan's Troubled Past."
The real story behind Zinkhan's transition from Texas to Georgia as told by my new source may give further lie to the benign portrait found in some Georgia publications after Zinkhan fled Athens that sunny Saturday in April, leaving bloodshed and heartbreak in his wake.
According to my source, George Zinkhan is still "running around because people without power either got squashed or were too afraid to say anything, and people who had power were more into preserving the hierarchy than doing the right thing. And now 3 people are dead."
The same person said that when Zinkhan left Houston in 1994 there was a federal lawsuit against him and the University there. It was apparently settled out of court.
The lawsuit was over Zinkhan's persistent, sexual harassment of fellow UH faculty members and grad students and the university's alleged failure to address that behavior. My source said that when the allegations first came to light, "some administrators were supportive, questioned ZInkhan's mental state (and that was 15 years ago), vowed to protect the victims, and so on." But that didn't last. Eventually, according to this person, the university tried to trivialize the allegations and may have even retaliated against the victims, essentially defending Zinkhan and portraying the plaintiffs as "the crazy ones."
Zinkhan's former colleague continued, saying that he "carried on a variety of non-professional relationships with untenured female professors and graduate students while he was at UH" and married to his first wife, Lydia Stoiadin.
The tipster addressed the Atlanta newspaper's initial portrait of Zinkhan as a private man: "A better word is secretive. Males interviewed said he never lost his temper. An alternative description is that he is cold, calculating and manipulative. Guns are not a recent interest of his."
I asked this person if the university system - specifically in Texas but also perhaps in Georgia - had enabled George Zinkhan's past bad behavior. The response was unequivocal:
Absolutely. As a tenured full professor, he was worth a lot to the university; he was one of the most well known professors in the business schools and was editor of Journal of Advertising at the time. Those are big feathers in the cap of a university trying to improve its reputation. Initially when the situation blew up, [those accusing Zinkhan of harassment] received wonderful reassurances. The notion that violence could be lurking and guns an interest of Zinkhan's was made known to them. (Which is why, when I heard he'd murdered 3 people on an NPR newscast, I was horrified, but not at all shocked that he was capable of such a thing [...]) Then it was like a switch flipped and they turned on [ZInkhan's accusers]. I assumed it was pressure from above.
I followed up by asking if university administrations had helped George Zinkhan hone a sense of entitlement. My source responded:
I wouldn't say entitlement, but I'm unaware of any negative consequences that he suffered. He was very brazen. He had a great deal of power, he only had one serious intellectual rival at his level in the marketing department. He had a lot of control over the doctoral program. Tens of thousands of dollars must have been spent to essentially defend him. How damaging could that possibly be to his ego?
The source went on to address descriptions in True Crime Report blog posts and comments from readers of Zinkhan's personality:
The description about him being controlling seems apt from what I heard and observed [...] My gut reaction is that he didn't kill himself [...] [Remorse] didn't seem to loom large in his personality. If he continued developing inappropriate relationships that included a huge power imbalance at UGA, I wouldn't be surprised. He did have a knack for getting to know doctoral students, and not just at UH. [...] I was aware of him having a relationship of some sort (bad poetry at a minimum, probably sexual) with a grad student [from] another school. Can't remember her name or affiliation...
In an e-mail, my anonymous correspondent singled out a comment made on the most recent blog post about Zinkhan. The following comment was posted by "mkg prof too" on May 8, 2009:
GZ was not the only professor at UH that hit on female doctoral students during the 1980's and 1990's. It was very common and there were NO reprimands. I agree with anonymous that the protection of predators by the good ole boy network needs to stop. When will universities take notice and do the right thing? The sexual pursuit of female doctoral students by (some) male faculty is common as dirt, especially if the student is attractive. Many male academics were nerds growing up and now have the chance to exploit their power over female junior faculty and students, and some of them are predators. And administrators too often let it pass or look the other way.
I have no direct knowledge about his dealings at UGA, except what an honest colleague of mine, formerly at UGA, has told me. Some faculty at Terry called GZ "lover boy." As soon as he got there he had a very open affair with one of the departmental staff members and consistently harrassed other women. The marketing faculty at UGA knew about this and many thought it was scandalous. But he was powerful--a chaired professor, and at one time the department chair. Both UH and UGA are to blame in this circumstance for not doing the right thing soon enough. After the shooting, the president of UGA was quoted as saying that GZ was a "respected" faculty member. This suggests that the president is either uninformed or dishonest. While no one would have predicted a triple murder, the fact is that GZ engaged in exploitative behavior toward woman for years, with little apparent cost or consequence. If he had been given a hard pushback early on, things might have turned out differently. We'll never know.
Source: "If UH had acted properly, maybe he would never have made it to UGA or another academic institution."
Athens-Clarke County police are still searching for George Zinkhan. They have issued sketches showing how Zinkhan might look without his beard or any hair at all. A "crime stoppers" reward of $1000 is being offered for information that might lead to Zinkhan's whereabouts. My own guess at the moment disagrees with the primary source for this post - I would be surprised if he was found alive. Suicide is not always an act of remorse or depression; for someone like George Zinkhan, it might be a final act of control. However, my source did pose this intriguing question: "Has anyone considered that he might have an accomplice?"








Fascinating insight, and a good read. Then again, this is why this is really the only true crime blog I frequent.
Posted 05/09/2009 at 03:08:35 AMGood question about him having an accomplice. It seems likely that one of many starry eyed females he seduced would help him, or he would have perhaps even a collegue or two who share such interests that would assist him .
Posted 05/09/2009 at 03:43:41 AMHe could have possibly left behind the passport and other personal effects on purpose to lead investigators to believe it was a suicide. (did he frequently travel to other countries in which a passport was required? the passport alone being in his suv indicates that he either went home after the shooting in a hurry to retrieve it, or had it planned out before hand and left it behind for whatever reason, though i doubt such an intelligent perpetrator would forget it.)
I'm thinking that he's possibly still around close, in the states somewhere, perhaps with a former student he seduced, or being helped by a sympathetic collegue.
He is pretty much a cunning and manipulative white collar sociopath who resorted to murder either out of a feeling of threat,or loss of perceived Control over his wife-object.(in his mind its fine for him to be adulterous but even the thought of his wife-object entertaining such fantasies enrages him and makes him feel inadequate, or lacking control over her)
I hope for a quick resolve, and Steve keep up the good work man, This is one of my favorite sites as well.
iustitia defluo said:
He could have possibly left behind the passport and other personal effects on purpose to lead investigators to believe it was a suicide. (did he frequently travel to other countries in which a passport was required? the passport alone being in his suv indicates that he either went home after the shooting in a hurry to retrieve it, or had it planned out before hand and left it behind for whatever reason, though i doubt such an intelligent perpetrator would forget it.)
--------
Posted 05/09/2009 at 12:00:33 PMHe had a home and a part-time teaching job in Amsterdam where he went several times a year (some reports say he spent summers there) so yes, he frequently needed a passport. I wonder if he didn't have two - can't you report one as lost and get a new one issued?
Police have found a body near where the car was found.
Posted 05/09/2009 at 01:26:37 PM[linkhttp://www.foxnews.com/]
Body that of Zinhan??
http://www.myfoxatlanta.com/dpp/news...Zinkhan_050909
Maybe he did kill himself. I had predicted his type would never give up. I would insist on DNA proof that this was actually his body, and not that of a "throw down" that he found from somewhere else. Trust by verify....
Posted 05/09/2009 at 01:43:32 PMThe body did NOT appear decomposed? After more than a week in the woods during the month of May? How peculiar. I wonder how they knew to go back and search some more? This is more intriguing than any CSI episode I ever watched...
Posted 05/09/2009 at 03:33:23 PMWhat a sad waste of life.
Posted 05/09/2009 at 04:25:32 PM"Two guns were found with the body, which was purposely hidden by dirt and brush, Athens-Clarke County Police Chief Joseph Lumpkin said. "
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,519625,00.html
Huh??? How and why does one "purposely hide" a body when committing suicide?
Posted 05/09/2009 at 04:33:20 PMReannan, he dug his grave, covered himself with debris, then shot himself in the head.
Posted 05/09/2009 at 05:31:41 PMI feel so sorry for his children. Well written and right on the money as usual Steve!
Posted 05/09/2009 at 05:33:03 PMFrom everything I have learned about this man, George Zinkhan, he appears to be a classic example of a narcissist. Unfortunately, I have had to deal with some of these narcissist-types, and the result has always been unpleasant, for me. They are universally selfish individuals, who have no recognition of the rights of others. The only advice a sane person needs with regard to this type individual is this: The moment you realize what you are dealing with (narcissism), run to the nearest exit, and don't ever let that narcissistic thing near you, again. I can state categorically that every ONE of the narcissists I have known has eventually caused serious trouble for their family, friends, and business associates. They continue to regularly try to cause even MORE trouble, even after they have been disowned and shunned by those wise enough to see through their selfish, selfish ways. Avoid these narcissists as if they were certain death, which they do sometimes turn out to be, as in the case of George Zinkhan.
Posted 05/09/2009 at 06:37:36 PMWOW!!! Steve, I am impressed. This morning I read your thoughts on this probably being a suicide and, lo and behold, you were right on the money!!! Good job and thanks for all of your hard work and effort!!
Posted 05/09/2009 at 07:25:30 PMAlso,..if he killed himself, it was to deny authority the chance of punishing him, and to avoid years in prison. It wouldnt be out of remorse for the victims.
Posted 05/09/2009 at 10:56:20 PMI figured he'd killed himself once they found the car--not out of remorse, but unwillingness to face the music. Most readers may not be aware of just how woodsy it is around there. It's the Appalachian foothills. It's really easy to walk fifty yards into the woods and effectively disappear.
Posted 05/09/2009 at 11:21:08 PMThe fox site does Not say it was a suicide yet. It only says the body was hidden and covered with brush. With Two guns present near the body and NO Comment on whether he left a note or not. ( weird that a suicidal man leaves everything behind but TWO guns when one would have done the trick)
Posted 05/10/2009 at 06:07:37 AMwas a Shovel found near the body? i imagine it would be difficult to dig ones own grave in the mountains with your bare hands...ever try digging through all the roots that are in the mountains with your hands?...might take a while.
Posted 05/10/2009 at 06:17:52 AMMy take is that he had fantasies of killing his wife but hadn't made a conscious decision to do it, or if he had, he had plans to do it in a way that would allow him to escape responsibility (e.g., murder her right before leaving the country or do it in such a way as to make it appear to be a break-in, etc.).
There were just too many imperfections in the murder as it actually happened for it to have been planned. I'm sure he was furious about the impending divorce and he probably had his suspicions about her relationship with Teague. The easy availability of his guns, coupled with her happiness and his misery that day, ignited his temper and lead to his impulsive murderous acts. The fact that he had no real getaway plan, left behind 20 or more eyewitnesses, and had his children in the car seem to bear this out.
To me it is not one bit surprising that he killed himself -- he had really backed himself into a corner and was looking at prison or death. He had no real means of escape and was smart enough to know that he couldn't use his phone, couldn't use his credit cards and had to hide his car.
The only really surprising thing is the batsh*t crazy burying of himself. I haven't ever heard of anyone doing that. I wonder what it says about him? That he had to prove that he was smarter by making people look for him and perhaps never find him? I don't get it at all.
Posted 05/10/2009 at 09:36:31 AMAs MC had predicted in the "troubled past" ZInkhan thread, hie hid his body. ...burying himself was a last controlling act.
Posted 05/10/2009 at 11:19:16 AMLooks like what was good for the goose wasn't good for the gander. Ok for the top dog prof to skirt chase, but when he suspects his wife of having an affair he turns killer. Powerful controlling men don't like to have affairs of their partners thrown in their face(OJ!).
Posted 05/10/2009 at 03:42:47 PMI worked for the University of Houston for a year. I have never in my life seen such dysfunctionality, monetary waste, and unnacountability as I saw at the university level. They put Congress to shame.
Good angles J, but one could just as easily surmise that he "thought he had a good plan in mind that went sour" or the precipitating stressor in the resturant set it off and spoiled Plan A. (they have'nt mentioned yet Why he made flight plans not long before the murder..routine vacation? Planning to try talking the wife into a rendevous getaway without the kids to patch things Up? Is that what the argument was about? there are many witnesses who have probably cleared the last question up) I cleared one up on my own though,..about the Shovel..i live bordering the woods, so i went out and tried various hand-style digging methods...a big pointed rock allowed me to dig a makeshift grave big enough to lay in and cover myself with weeds...so its not impossible that he simply made-do with material on hand. (its pointless to wonder how long he had suicide in mind though, since he took two guns with him he possibly had one plan of shooting it out with police, but then opted for the quick way...i agree with those who have commented that killing himself was his final act of petulance against authority...and a way to show he had control till the very end by CHoosing the nature of his death) Good input J! I've noticed that most of the people on this particular site are Much more stimulating than on other sites where you need a Hooked on phonics for crime dummies manual to interpret their jabber. thanks you all...
Posted 05/11/2009 at 12:32:49 AM@iustitia, we actually do know why he was going to Amsterdam. He was scheduled to start working that week at a university there where he'd been spending summers for the past several years. I think I remember reading that his wife wasn't going with him, but I don't remeber where I saw that. Also, I got Teague and Tanner confused in my last comment; it was Tanner that his wife may or may not have been seeing romantically.
I agree with you that there are other alternatives to what I laid out, but I disagree with people who think it was a diabolical plan carefully laid out to fool people into thinking it was impulsive. I think it really was impulsive (whether he had murder in mind or not).
Posted 05/11/2009 at 12:27:25 PMhey steve
I can get to your individual articles from twitter, but I can't seem to make your blog update. When I go to the site I get the Amber Alert you posted on May 4th. What gives?
Try clearing your browser cache.
Posted 05/11/2009 at 12:38:48 PMJ - this may give you second thoughts about the possibility of premeditation.
http://tiny.cc/EyUDB
He printed out a map the night before the murders to a Terry college victim/nemesis...it was found in his jeep. She was at the movies that afternoon... but perhaps he was ready to settle scores.
Posted 05/11/2009 at 04:09:10 PMJ, the more i mulled over it, the more i'm inclined to also think it was impulsive. (argument motivated with love triangle overtones possibly present) I think the reason many may have originally assumed diabolical motives was due to the portrayal of the mans narcissistic qualities, once the allure of piecing together the workings of a sociopathic type kicks in ,the mind begins to overlook the more probable evidence at hand in favor of the socially glamourous. (in this instance i am of the guilty lot i must add to avoid being a hypocrite.)Another thing was the mans intelligence J, he was a tenured professor...some forget that they are not immune to the basic passions of heart/emotion, and when their type commits a crime its easy to start envisioning a well laid out illusion on the part of a highly sophisticated criminal mastermind. ( this case should assist me in analytic-evolution, and serve as a humbling reminder that such types are rare in reality.) Thanks for the info on the amsterdam univeristy position.
Posted 05/11/2009 at 10:03:55 PMHe was going to Amsterdam under the pretext of teaching at an open university. This is not a glamorous gig in academe. It makes no sense.
Rather, I'd suggest going to Amsterdam in the summer & at Xmas was his hedonistic holiday ... women, dope, family-free, etc. This is classic for a socio/psychopath. And Z was definitely one of those.
Posted 05/11/2009 at 10:08:15 PMSarah, it could also just be the jealousy of a scorned lover who wanted to keep dibs on his wife, he could have wanted to verify a Rumor of affair by catching her with him, i guess you just never know.If he had a kill-plan in mind when he confronted them in the resturant, it seems he would have had the Gun on him already though . You dont go into a resturant intent on killing without the weapon afterall.
Posted 05/11/2009 at 10:59:58 PMSteve, great job on television tonight. Your professionalism and knowledge of these cases is superb. These posts are riveting, keep up the good writing. We love it.
Posted 05/12/2009 at 12:22:50 AMI agree that the map to Carroll's house does thicken the plot. I think she's probably right that he didn't print out a map to her house because he wanted to drop in for tea. Still, I doubt he meant for the murders to go down exactly the way they did.
I had recently run across the legal documents in Carroll's settlement with the University over her putative role in creating a 'hostile work environment' and wondered if he had any involvement (it's usually a small set of people who are involved in almost every nutty situation in a workplace). I don't even pretend to know what the truth was or who was right or wrong, but the one thing I do know is that was one seriously dysfunctional department. I'll be interested in seeing how this whole thing plays out.
Documents:
Posted 05/12/2009 at 03:40:38 PMhttp://media.www.redandblack.com/media/storage/paper871/news/2008/09/22/News/Agreement.To.Pay.Terry.College.Professor.Thousands.wdocuments.Agreement-3443353.shtml
Wow J, that was interesting. Her comments about the article were interesting.
Posted 05/13/2009 at 01:51:09 AMWell, all I can say is that this post and the comments sure are quite the contrast to this article on CNN:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/05/15/zinkhan.body/index.html
"Neighbors, students and fellow faculty members all concur that Zinkhan was standoffish, but their accounts also paint a contradictory image of the marketing professor who would occasionally walk the halls of UGA's business college barefoot.
Some faculty members were quick to defend Zinkhan, but reluctant to do so on record. One said he felt it was a university matter. Another was reluctant to be on record defending an accused mass killer.
"He's being painted as an ogre, which doesn't fit," said the former.
Two faculty members said Zinkhan was introverted but friendly. He was close to some colleagues. He remembered their birthdays and was generous with gifts at Christmas.
His quirky behavior was generally overlooked because of his brilliance, a colleague said. One fellow professor went so far as to call him a genius, and not just with marketing, either.
Zinkhan apparently was well-versed in a wide range of topics -- art, opera, architecture -- and he loved sports. Faculty members recalled that the strapping 6-foot-2 Zinkhan played on the intramural softball team with some of his graduate students, and he liked to boast of his home runs.
He also loved his son, 8, and daughter, 10, and regularly brought them to work.
Neighbors said they saw him outside playing soccer with the kids on a miniature goal that still sat in the yard this week. A basketball goal with a rim a foot or two below regulation stood over the Zinkhans' driveway, and a miniature yellow house sat dormant in his wooded backyard."
Posted 05/15/2009 at 09:59:15 PMI know we often try to rationalise these type of tragedies, and hence want to feel that there must have been something innately wrong with a person who could do such a thing, but life can be tragic, and we have no idea what could turn a man with so much to lose to end his own life and those he (used?) to love.
Cold, calculating and manipulative???
You expect someone who rises to the upper echelons of some educational bureacracy to be anything other than cold, calculating and manipulative?
Posted 05/16/2009 at 07:34:29 AMCan we get some facts please? What about his first divorce? His wife divorced him citing "cruety and adultery"...this was in Texas I presume. Was that mental cruelty or physical or both? Are any of the divorce proceedings public record? It seems she was much more upfront (or angry or both) about the reasons than he was. Who initated the divorce proceedings, she or he? His relationship with Marie Bruce: did she actually have an affair with him from the marketing dept at UGA before marriage? Was she having an affair with Tanner? Why did she say she wanted a divorce? It seems that there is both a community and a cultural (small Southern town) desire to sweep everything under the rug here...I haven't seen a multiple murder caused by someone with a lot of social contacts handled so gingerly in a long time. Most people locally including the university seem to not be saying anything to news sources. This includes the nameless people who spoke to the police who described at least part of the "domestic problems". What really happened? Something does not exactly fit. His kids from his first marriage seem okay with him (is this true?--it is what was reported in the news)so one assumes that he hid what he was doing during that marriage. I think there is probably something very obvious not being addressed by the police as happened in the Chandra Levy murder. Maybe Zinkhan got positive proof that his wife was sleeping with Tanner and snapped. The little information provided suggests that he was carefully going along starting to separate from her by looking for another job and planning his summer in Holland and going to counselling, so the obvious possibility is that some new piece of information tipped him over the edge.
Posted 05/17/2009 at 06:45:13 AMI was a doctoral student at UGA when Zinkhan was chosen to become our Marketing Dept Head and COCA COLA endowed chair in the mid-90's. Marie Bruce was employed by the department as a student advisor. At the time, it was open gossip among the doctoral students that George had been forced out at Houston because of sexual harassment charges. Odd... I personally was very sheltered and unconnected at the time... so, why would a clueless, unconnected PhD student have received the U-H gossip? Very interesting to have had the other TrueCrimeReport contributors help fill in this important issue after all these years! Well, it seems George Z didn't learn his lesson... he struck up an affair with employee Marie Bruce very quickly. Another bit of interesting views from the field... when gathering with fellow doctoral students I remember we openly mocked and imitated George's blatant approaches toward female colleagues and doctoral students at academic conferences. He was so obvious... head and neck were always periscoping... he would walk away from males in mid-sentence... but, would endlessly listen to attractive females. Did this for YEARS!! Relentless poon hound. Scores of colleagues have seen this... but, again, the guy was a powerhouse in the field... folks in academia are always beholden to the EDITOR of the Journals! (He was editor of J of Advertising, J of Academy of Marketing Science, was chair of leading academic conferences. So, he would use his position to "help" attractive females get published. (One of his latest "mentees" was Angeline Close of UNLV... check out her pic on her University website.) By the way, there has been over a decade of bad blood between Barb Carroll and George Z... starting way back when he was department head. They simply did not speak to each other anymore... So, Barb had a very good reason to fear for her safety when the map to her house was found in Z's Jeep. Anyone who thinks they had an ongoing affair and that Barb Carroll was involved in George's twisted end are WAY OFF BASE! However, George probably harbored anger toward Barb regarding long-standing workplace arguments and issues. In the end, it seems George was just another asshole who would mess around at will, but, snapped when his wife began to venture out on her own. By the way, I noticed a person who posted a message that George had become a FACEBOOK "friend" of CLEMSON U... the same place that victim Tom Tanner worked... perhaps GZ was attempting to get more info on TT? Also, it appears that Tom Tanner was still living in Athens, even though he was working at Clemson. These are items that have been culled from numerous news sources... but, who knows how reliable anything is these days? So, perhaps Marie and Tom were very close... even having an affair. It would seem to have benefits... Marie's two daughters probably got along great with Tom's daughter. George may have already been "detaching"... reports were that he applied for a position at Alabama in March... was turned down. Too bad George didn't just wait a week and get on that plane to Amsterdam and just go chase some new mentees. It is awful that Tom Tanner's daughter had to see her own father gunned down before her very eyes. And, it is also sad that Z's two daughters had their rather fun and loving mother taken away from them. George was a very weird mofo. So glad folks foiled his attempt to be a mystery for the ages... we found you George... found you in a hole just a few hundred yards from the elementary school playground... half of you was brilliant... the other half was simply unethical, sleazy, creepy and an opportunistic womanizing bully. I think I know what made you snap... you wanted to be the cool artistic one... but, you were merely an uncool business professor... your wife ACTUALLY WAS the COOL ARTISTIC ONE... she was moving on to a younger, cooler, more artistic version of you... she had everything that you wanted but didn't get... so you killed her... you pathetic jealous jerk... you aren't an intriguing mystery... you are another obvious simple controlling bully... glad you can no longer control anyone
Posted 05/18/2009 at 02:48:27 PMOooo, Thanks Doc. Student, very percepetive, and loved the fact that you removed any romanticism from the story where George was concerned.
Steeeeeve, where are you? I need a literati fix!
Posted 05/18/2009 at 03:39:16 PMThanks Doc. Student also. Sociopaths are about control not romance. It is their addiction. JZ's first wife was no interest in JZ's life. That is how he could walk away as when a sociopath grows in power he is most dangerous. He could never love anyone not even his own children. It was strictly about power. In Marie he met his match. She was going to put him down. JZ could not deal with this at all it was making him crazier and crazier. JZ was not about to let her get away with this in eyes just like OJ Simpson. JZ's life in a sociopath was growing down also and his power would not be growing as it once was in the beginning with Marie. He could not handle any of it. I understand also that they had to track down his son in Utah and beg him to tag the ashes of JZ's body. His first family was so hurt by him and his cruel treatment. Sad for his first wife because she wasted 20 years of married life with a man for really nothing. I hope she found her happiness after he left but it is difficult when sociopaths engage you in their web all those years as they "love you so much" until they are ready to discard you. It is an outrage what does go on in the educational system. They seem to attract people with huge ego's like this. Really they don't work to hard as it is like play to them. I'd like some of them to try digging ditches or cleaning toilets instead of the free play time they have. That does not apply to all but the buddy system protects the old gaurd and their antics. How many women were victims throughout the years of his predatory state. Well I guess you can say in the end it has ended. However, the true victims are the children left behind with no father and no mother. Or maybe not so..for they will not have to deal with the dysfunctionality and may have a chance of being raised normally.
Posted 05/20/2009 at 02:44:11 PMI live about a half mile from where Gz's body was found.Barb Carroll seems to relish the media attention.If she was so afraid of GZ why didn't she come forward the day of the murders? How do we know for sure that GZ printed a mapquest map to B.Carrolls' house?I think that Marie Bruce was communicating with BC to gain damaging testimony about GZ for their pending divorce. If GZ was going to kill B.Carroll he would have done it that morning before he went to the Town and Gown to confront Marie.A close source told me that Zinkhan had intercepted a phone call from a real estate agent in S. Carolina the day before he killed the three.I think he really just "snapped".Especially after finding a map to his nemesis' house.He probably felt betrayed by his wife.She was planning on divorcing him and moving to SC with the kids(a son and daughter).
Posted 06/04/2009 at 09:21:23 AMAt last, Elle, a scenario that makes sense.
Posted 06/05/2009 at 11:36:37 AMWith the outlandish personalities involved here, that's no easy task.